Jump to Content
Pennsylvania Firearm Owners Association

Articles categorized under “Opinion”

Choosing the Political Fight instead of Law Enforcement

According to a report by the Philadelphia Daily News, police leadership and prosecutors are upset that law-abiding gun owners are seeking licenses to carry from states that are more strict and uniform in their issuing practices. In an effort to create controversy where little evidence exists, the Daily News embraces sensational hypotheticals that, when broken down, truly reflect upon the dysfunction within Philadelphia’s criminal justice system.

For example, Lt. Lisa King cites concerns that applicants to out-of-state licensing authorities might have been arrested, but never convicted of any crimes. To her, such a situation seemingly demands the denial of Constitutional rights without any effort by authorities to prove guilt. Fortunately for those of us who believe in the rule of law, our justice system is one based on a presumption of innocence until the state can prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury of our peers.

District Attorney Seth Williams, whose office frequently refuses to process cases of known criminals who are disqualified from owning – let along carrying – a gun, announced plans for his “legislation unit” to look into the matter. Residents of Philadelphia might ask why their tax dollars are being used to lobby rather than prosecute those who have actually committed crimes.

As initially mentioned to the Daily News reporter, PAFOA has firsthand accounts of those who have faced the abusive and arbitrary licensing requirements of the City. When licenses of the victims are regularly revoked simply because a home or car is broken into, it is clear that the Police Department would rather pick on easier targets – those who seek to follow the law – than investigate cases of actual criminals.

Attorney General Tom Corbett’s spokesperson came to the defense of those who opt for an out-of-state permit, noting that the requirements for Florida are actually more strict than Pennsylvania. Though that did not stop the anti-gun group, CeasefirePA from blaming him for the practice. In an admission to the paper, the organization said this is an opening salvo in a planned attack on the Attorney General in the upcoming gubernatorial elections.

Finally, the article does reveal that the Police Department plans to work closely with the District Attorney on the issue. One might assume this means they will work together to prosecute more cases against violent criminals. However, rather than concentrating on getting dangerous people off the streets of Philadelphia, King announced a plan to subpoena records from Florida in order to target the Philadelphia residents who have lawfully obtained a permit from the state. It speaks volumes that the City leaders would rather use resources and manpower to target those who can pass multiple background checks and have appropriate firearms training rather than focusing on putting more hardened criminals behind bars.


Nancy Pelosi Calls for “Compromise” on Guns

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi took to the airwaves to discuss gun control on Good Morning America this week, proposing new restrictions on gun owners in response to the Pittsburgh shootings.  Her proposal to the show’s host includes registration of guns and their owners, a step that has historically lead to confiscation.

In addition, Speaker Pelosi recommends we ban guns from crossing state lines.  She will put an end to competitions such as NRA’s Camp Perry, hurt hunters who prefer to take to the fields in a neighboring state, and potentially even restricting whether or not gun owners can take their firearms with them if they move.  These restrictions are absurd!

The only way to shut Nancy Pelosi’s gun control fantasies down is to take quick action to put pressure on “blue dog” Democrats, who come from more conservative districts, and are most vulnerable to calls for gun control.  We have a number of them in Pennsylvania.  They are:

If you live in any of these districts, please use the links above to contact your representative and tell them that you oppose the Speaker Pelosi’s gun control agenda.  Express skepticism about your trust in the Democratic Party to protect your Second Amendment rights.  Be aware that many of the representatives above are pro-gun, and will likely be on our side, but don’t let them take you for granted, and make sure they understand that you expect them to represent the interests of gun owners in your district, and not help Nancy Pelosi bring her San Francisco attitudes on guns to Pennsylvania.


York Daily Record: Lost & Stolen Gun law won’t scare scarecrows

It seems that while the York City Council is having trouble understanding why Lost & Stolen legislation is both ineffective and illegal, the York Daily Record understands clearly:

The Scarecrow wasn’t exactly a genius — that’s why the straw man wanted a brain.

Likewise, it seems that most “straw purchasers” — people who buy guns for bad guys — have heads more full of hay matter than gray matter.

And so you have to wonder: Does York city really need a complicated new law to torch them?

That’s the question before the York City Council next week. Members are scheduled to vote on an ordinance requiring people to report lost or stolen guns within 72 hours after they discover them missing.

Maybe that seems like common sense — hardly the kind of thing you’d need a law for. Good citizens who have legally purchased firearms would be foolish not to call police if their guns are stolen. That’s just what you do when something gets stolen.

But should it be illegal to fail to do so? Should we run the risk of criminalizing people who, say, have a gun stolen, perhaps by “friends” or family members, who don’t even know their weapons are missing, if they fail to report the loss or theft?

Isn’t that a little like victimizing the victim?

Hopefully such common sense will be contagious.

[Via InYork.com]


One-Gun-a-Month in New Jersey

Some of you may have noticed this editorial over at The Philadelphia Inquirer declaring the imminent passage of “One-gun-a-month” rationing scheme in The Garden State, and admonishing Harrisburg to follow Trenton’s lead.  There are two problems with this editorial.

One, it assumes that this law to ration gun ownership is effective at its stated purpose, which is to reduce illegal gun trafficking.  We know from other states that have passed it, that it has now been shown to do any such thing.  South Carolina had a long standing gun rationing scheme, which is repealed because there was no evidence that it was effective.  Multiple sales are already reported to the BATF and local law enforcement, so if these types of purchases are really a problem, more laws aren’t the solution.

The other mistake is to assume that passage of gun rationing in New Jersey is inevitable.  It is not.  You get a hint of that here:

That effort deserves the full support of lawmakers from South Jersey, including Senate Majority Leader Stephen Sweeney (D., Gloucester). But Sweeney is not yet on board with the proposal, and seems to be quoting from the NRA’s bullet points about the need to enforce existing gun regulations more fully.

This reveals the Inquirer’s true intention in publishing this editorial, which is to publicly shame Senator Sweeney into signing on to Bryan Miller’s gun rationing scheme.  The reason they have to do this is because they are coming up short on votes in the New Jersey State Senate to get this latest restriction on Second Amendment rights passed.  I would encourage everyone to send a note to Senator Sweeney to thank him for standing up for your rights.  If you’re a New Jersey resident, the critical time is now for contacting your Senators and State Assemblymen.

There is a very real chance of stopping a gun control bill in New Jersey.  Only a few years ago, Bryan Miller could ask the New Jersey legislature to jump, and they would ask “How High?”  Now they are starting to ask questions.  This is critical for both Pennsylvania and New Jersey residents.  For New Jersey residents, it’s the first step in reversing a long decline in gun rights that’s happened since 1968.  For Pennsylvanians, it’s a chance to ensure that Bryan Miller, and the full resources of the New Jersey Gun Control movement are tied up fighting in Trenton, rather than in Harrisburg.  We will both benefit from this win, but we must keep the pressure on.


North Dakota has 0 gun murders in 2008, Brady Campaign group claims need for gun control

As 2008 came to a close, the North Dakota Attorney General Wayne Stenehjem announced that there were only 2 murders in North Dakota in 2008, and both of them involved stabbings. The irony of this is that the Brady Campaign’s Profile of North Dakota gives them a 4 out of 100 points for “gun control”, basically meaning they think North Dakota needs a whole lot more of it. It must be difficult to keep a straight face when working at the Brady Campaign, knowing that your numbers mean pretty much the opposite of what you intend.


Philadelphia: Shameless example of disregarding law

It’s time for Philadelphia leaders to understand that lawlessness by the city government is one of the many factors contributing to the city’s culture of crime and violence. The lack of respect city officials have shown for the laws of Pennsylvania by passing illegal gun-control ordinances sets a tone for residents that honoring the rule of law is optional in this city.

Read more


PATH Coalition employs Lies, Deception to Further Their Anti-Gun Agenda

Stooping to a new low, PATH uses false statements about straw purchases to push gun control.

Read more